data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8604/e860429f708b8823a118b9fa4745e43e1cb86d16" alt=""
GeekLawyer ruminates on Twitter. This social networking tool has the capacity to obsess its users without knowing why. But if you can pack a message into 140 characters, then it's for you. GeekLawyer can be followed at @geeklawyer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c44e/8c44e219f1ce97eb24a214322bf62bfb301bebe3" alt=""
The problem for most early Twitter users is: What is this for? Can it be monetized? What's its value? And so on. The best way to treat it is to use it and see what happens. Search out others and link to them and before you know it, you are engaged in a series of conversations both serious and stupid.
There's a huge array of Twitter tools now. (If you can't answer the why part, why on earth are people out there making these things?) For tweeting you can just go to twitter.com and tweet from within your browser, but a separate application like the free TweetDeck is better. With other tools you can combine twittering with blogging and the like. Richard Herring likes to use his iPhone to tweet on his tour. You can even now consolidate your social networking activities in one place with tools like OnePoke.com.
News organizations are tweeting--BBC and CNN as well as less formal commentators like Guido Fawkes. Both Stephen Fry and Jonathan Ross have large twitter followings.
Law schools are now tweeting in addition to running their own blogs, eg. Harvard and Chicago. I'm not aware of any UK law schools using these yet. Mind you most UK law schools think having a website is cool! They may yet migrate into the 21st century.
Comments