Skip to main content

John Flood's Random Academic Thoughts (RATs)

Search This Blog

Flying Home from Law Without Walls 2012...

on April 17, 2012

Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

(thanks to New Yorker)

Some of the presentations given at Law Without Walls 2012 would have gone down fabulously at TED.

Law Without Walls

Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

Comments

Popular Posts

The Accountants Are Really Coming...this time....

(thanks to giant bomb.com) I'm sure PwC, EY, KPMG, and Deloitte would like to be thought of the same way as these bands, but...dream on. Why are they there? A press release from Karl Chapman popped into my overstuffed mailbox saying Riverview Law has just been acquired by EY . Despite the hype of press releases, this is a significant move in the legal services market. At bottom it shows two things: NewLaw is coming of age and is now attractive to others; the accountants, particularly the Big Four, are serious about conquering the legal services market. Law firms should be worried because I believe they are on borrowed time. A few years ago I sat in a meeting at the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) in London discussing how and if accountants should be given regulatory powers in legal services. The accountants said they only wanted powers for probate. They declared they wanted no other regulatory authority. Really? I thought to myself. Surely no one believes that. The...

How Courts Compete with Each Other

(thanks to rechtspraak.nl) It can be a harsh world in the world of courts today. Competition is intensifying. Courts not only have to pay their way, they now have to face challenge from equivalent courts in foreign jurisdictions. What might have been a cosy sinecure in the past is now cold and clinical. International arbitration is the prototypical competitive scene as Stockholm, Paris, New York, and London slug it out for disputes. Countries pass legislation according arbitral communities all kinds of rights in order to help them succeed. Creating competitive courts is a much harder process. Courts are creatures of government who must use tax monies to fund them when there are many other claims on those pounds, dollars and euros. But to consider them mere cost centres would fail on several levels. If the rule of law is central to society and the economy, no country should skimp on its courts and judges. England and Wales have long been in the vanguard of promoting British ...

Why Law Firms Must Change How They Work (or do they?)

The Financial Times has published an article with this title (£). It's a bit of a strange piece, and a number of the commenters agree. The gist of the piece is that unless big law firms change their ways of working--long hours, lack of promotion prospects, especially for women--they are doomed. Their hegemony is no longer assured because upstarts can overcome barriers to entry and poach white shoe work. The example given is Kirkland & Ellis from Chicago taking over private equity work. So excuse the cliché, a swallow does not summer make... While the upper echelons of big law seem to have been there for evermore a study of history shows otherwise. Yes some firms like Freshfields have been around a couple of hundred years but Allen & Overy came into being in the 1930s, and Baker & McKenzie was a positive late starter in the 1950s. And I haven't even mentioned Skadden Arps and Wachtell Lipton. So is it a surprise that Kirkland has targeted a field of work an...

Powered by Blogger